• State TI Thinks Resolved
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 11 replies
  • Answers 4 answers
  • Subscribers 66 subscribers
  • Views 861 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Support feedback
Options
Options
Similar topics

This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

Peltier Module Control Circuit

YaD
Prodigy 60 points
Other Parts Discussed in Thread: DRV592

Hello All,

We are working on a small peltier module control circuit : 3.8Vmax - 2Amax - 1.6Ohm

Atfer runing some lab tests, we reached a compromise in operational parameters with a maximum current of 800mA (hich is enough for our application). and since this would be supplied by a battery,the driving current must be limited.

Going through this application note : SLUA979A, It appears that constant current might be more efficient than PWM driving 

and based on this : [FAQ] What motor drivers should be considered for driving Thermoelectric cooling (TEC) elements, or Peltier devices?. There are some pretty good drivers to use in such application. my issue is there either out of range of my requirements ( 3V - 0.8A) or currenlty out of stock.

I would appreciated if you can recommand any part number/application note compatble with this application

Thank you in advance for your support

  • 0
    TI__Guru 54675 points

    Hello,

    For lower voltage operation, please consider the DRV59x family of devices.  

    Regards,

    Ryan

  • 0 in reply to Ryan Kehr
    Prodigy 60 points

    Thank you Ryan for the feedback.

    I have checked the DRV592.

    Is there a way to control the current internally without the need of external sensing circuit going to the MCU's ADC ?

    will the current have to be controlled by controlling the output voltage ( playing on the PWM Duty cycle) ?

    Is there a spice model for this particular part, or a similar one ?


    Thank you 

  • 0 in reply to YaD
    TI__Guru 54675 points

    Unfortunately, we do not have any devices like that.  The loop would have to be closed externally and you are correct...PWM duty cycle adjusted.

    For spice model, you can request one at the page below.  Scroll down and hit request button.

    https://www.ti.com/product/DRV592

    Regards,

    Ryan

  • 0 in reply to Ryan Kehr
    Prodigy 60 points

    I have requested and downloaded Pspice for TI, but unfortunately the DRV592 is not available on it.

    any suggestions ?

  • 0 in reply to YaD
    TI__Guru 54675 points

    I don't support those devices directly, but in a lot of cases we don't have models for all devices.  I apologize for the inconvenience.

  • 0 in reply to Ryan Kehr
    Prodigy 60 points

    DRV592_TEC_control_Isense.rarThank you Ryan for your support.

    Couple of questions please.

    - Can I use different voltages for AVDD and PVDD ? if so, would the the VIH/VIL thresholds be depandant to AVDD ?

    - As for the Over-current fault, does the device completely shuts down or only goes into HiZ mode ( 2kOohm pulled down)?

    - For the undervoltage protection, based on the description it is triggered when supply voltages are below 2.8V, would I still be able to use the boundary supply voltage of 2.8V, or I better leave some room ( 3V perhaps)

    Also, could you please review the attached circuit ? I have tried to model the functional behavior of the DRV592,  would appreciate it if you could confirm or deny the function similarities ( as my client is requesting simulated POC).

    the active filter part still needs some tuning.

    Thank you again.

  • 0 in reply to YaD
    TI__Guru 54675 points

    Hello,

    As I don't support this device, I am moving to the team that does.

    Regards,

    Ryan

  • 0 in reply to Ryan Kehr
    TI__Intellectual 2620 points

    YaD,

    My team will pick this up and respond by Tuesday.

    Brian

  • 0 in reply to YaD
    TI__Genius 17150 points
    YaD said:
    Can I use different voltages for AVDD and PVDD ? if so, would the the VIH/VIL thresholds be depandant to AVDD ?

    AVDD and PVDD can be any voltage between 2.8 to 5.5V it is OK to use different supply voltages. the VIH, VIL thresholds will not change with AVDD

    YaD said:
    As for the Over-current fault, does the device completely shuts down or only goes into HiZ mode ( 2kOohm pulled down)?

    The Best explanation for the behavior of an overcurrent event can be found on page 10 of the D/S. The over current event will cause the outputs to go Hi-Z for 3-5us and then the device resets

    "The over-current fault is reported when the output current exceeds four amps. As soon as the condition is sensed, the over-current fault is set and the outputs go into a high-impedance state for approximately 3 µs to 5 µs (500 kHz operation). After 3 µs to 5 µs, the outputs are re-enabled. If the over-current condition has ended, the fault is cleared and the device resumes normal operation. If the over-current condition still exists, the above sequence repeats." 

    YaD said:
    For the undervoltage protection, based on the description it is triggered when supply voltages are below 2.8V, would I still be able to use the boundary supply voltage of 2.8V, or I better leave some room ( 3V perhaps)

    While 2.8V is within the recommended operating regions of this device if there is concern of having large ripple on the supply voltage then leaving some room (3V for example) may be a good idea.

    I am not sure how to open the .asc file type. If I where to review the schematic I would compare it to the Typical application circuit on page 8 of the D/S

    Regards,

    Arthur

  • 0 in reply to Arthur Brown
    Prodigy 60 points

    Thank you Arthur for the clear feedback.

    The .asc file i attached is an Ltspice simulation attempt of the DRV592 functional behavior.

  • 0 in reply to YaD
    TI__Mastermind 23495 points

    Hi,

    Did Arthur's feedback answer your questions? If not, could you please clarify what is still unclear and provide the proper schematic as well (not an .asc file)?

    Thanks,

    Jeff