Fig 1.
Example Caucasian and Asian stimuli in the three formats used in Experiment 1: Real, CGR, CGA.
A slight view change was included between study and test (i.e., study faces = front view, test faces = 5° left or right). Note the same identities are depicted in the Real and CGR conditions.
Table 1.
Experiment 1: Mean (SD) self-reported contact with own-race, other-race and CG faces.
Table 2.
Mean (SD) face recognition accuracy (d') as a function of participant race, race of face and face format.
Fig 2.
Experiment 1: recognition accuracy for own-race faces in the three face format conditions collapsed across race of participant.
Error bars show ± 1 SEM. *** = p < .001.
Fig 3.
Experiment 1: Other-race effect (d' own-race minus d' other-race) as a function of format for A. Asian participants and B.Caucasian participants.
Results of one sample significance tests of the ORE are shown at the base of the bars. Error bars show ± 1 SEM. *** = p < .001,** = p <.01,+= p = .07.
Fig 4.
An example trial screen from Experiment 2 showing an Asian CGR target present trial.
Participants were required to identify the target depicted at the top of the screen in the array below. The correct response in this example is 9.
Table 3.
Experiment 2: Mean (SD) self-reported contact.
Table 4.
Experiment 2: Mean (SD) face recognition accuracy (% correct) for target present (TP) and target absent (TA) trials as a function of participant race, race of face and face format.
Fig 5.
Experiment 2: discrimination accuracy for own-race faces in the two format conditions collapsed across race of participant for A. target present trials and B. target absent trials.
Error bars show ± 1 SEM. *** = p < .001.